Pages

Showing posts with label Corporation law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corporation law. Show all posts

Monday, September 05, 2016

Change of Address within the same City or Municipality may be done in GIS

For clarification to the SEC Memorandum No. 6 and 16, the change of address that would require Amendment of Articled of Incorporation does not apply when the company already has a complete address in its Article of Incorporation but had transferred to another office in the same City or Municipality.

The SEC Memorandum no 16 states:

"(1.) In the event that a corporation whose principal address as indicated in its articles is already specific and complete or fully compliant with he aforementioned circulars, has moved to another location within the same city or municipality, the corporation is not required to file an amended articles of incorporation. However, it must declare its new or current specific address in its General Information Sheet (GIS) within 15 days from transfer to its new location or effectivity of this Circular. "Metro Manila" shall not be considered a city to municipality for this purpose."




CGRLAW & Associates
5F First Global Building, 122 Gamboa Street
corner Salcedo Street, Legaspi Village, Makati City
Tel. No. (+63 2) 985 4322
email: claude.requino@cgrlaw.ph
            info@cgrlaw.ph


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.








Wednesday, April 09, 2014

May a Foreigner be elected as President in a Corporation?


May a Foreigner be elected as President in a Corporation?

The answer would depend on what business the corporation is engaged. If the corporation is engaged in an activity where foreign ownership is restricted under Philippine laws, a foreigner cannot be a President of the corporation.

The Sec. 2-A of Commonwealth Act No. 108, as amended, bans foreigners from being elected or appointed to management positions as president, vice-president, treasurer, secretary, etc. in business activities where there is a constitutional or statutory provision imposing a specific nationality requirement as a requisite for exercise or enjoyment of a right, franchise or privilege. (SEC Opinion No 11-37)

In the opinion of the Department of Justice it states: A reading of Section 2-A readily reveals the legislative intent to complement our nationalization laws by closing any avenue whereby aliens may defeat their purpose (King v. Hernaez, 4SCRA 792). It penalizes the employment of aliens in any position pertaining to management, operation, administration and control, whether as an officer, employee, or labor therein, which means that the employment of a person who is not a Filipino citizen even in a minor or clerical or non-control position is prohibited.

In arriving at this conclusion, I am guided by the underlying intent behind the nationalization of employment provided for in Anti-Dummy Law, which is to eradicate the shackles of foreign economic control and domination in the country (Universal Corn Products, Inc. v. Rice and Corn Board, 20 SCRA 1048)

Therefore, when this circumstance arises, it is advised to check the Negative List to see if the business of the corporation is included in the restricted business, otherwise,  there is no prohibition for an alien to be President.

CGRLAW & Associates
5F First Global Building, 122 Gamboa Street
corner Salcedo Street, Legaspi Village, Makati City
Tel. No. (+63 2) 985 4322/  (+63 2) 889 5210
Mobile: +63 918 948 6092
email:atty.claudio.g.requino@live.com.ph
   claude.requino@cgrlaw.tk
           info@cgrlaw.tk


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Friday, March 14, 2014

FOREIGN CORPORATION INVESTING IN AN UNINCORPORATED CONSORTIUM NEEDS A LICENSE TO DO BUSINESS IN THE PHILIPPINES


A Foreign Corporation that intends to invest in an unincorporated consortium in the Philippines must have a license to do transact even if it does not hold a controlling interest in the consortium and not the operator of the said consortium.
This is because an unincorporated consortium is considered as a partnership. Hence, it has to comply with the Foreign Investment Act of 1991 and laws on partnership. The answer would be otherwise, if the investment would be in a domestic corporation.

The exception in the Foreign Investment Act, which would not require acquiring license to transact business are as follows:
1.     Mere investment as a shareholder by a foreign entity in domestic corporation duly registered to do business.
2.     Having nominee director to represent its interest in such corporation.

Clearly, the exception pertains to domestic corporations and not to a partnership. Considering that the exemption from the doing business rule pertains only to investment in a corporation, investment in any other business organization, firm or entity (e.g. partnership) would not automatically constitute an exemption. In this connection, participating in the management, supervision or control of any domestic business, firm, entity or corporation in the Philippines is considered doing business. Consequently, following the strict interpretation rule, the only automatically exempt management, supervision or control is that of a corporation (i.e. having nominee director or office to represent its interest in such corporation) and not of any other entity, such as partnership. (SEC Opinion 14-01)

CGRLAW & Associates
5F First Global Building, 122 Gamboa Street
corner Salcedo Street, Legaspi Village, Makati City
Tel. No. (+63 2) 985 4322/  (+63 2) 889 5210
Mobile: +63 918 948 6092
email:atty.claudio.g.requino@live.com.ph
   claude.requino@cgrlaw.tk
           info@cgrlaw.tk


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Friday, September 27, 2013

Loan Shark Scam (10% interest per month)



FACTS:
            Peter John Nunez is an employee of Zardo International currently assigned at the Accounting Department as a Payroll Supervisor. He is also the Secretary of the employees association. Reports and complaints have reached the Management of Zardo International that Nunez had been lending money to his co-employee with 10% interest per month. He also collected the ATM cards of the employees and forcibly collects the payment of the loan by withdrawing the money from the ATM cards of the employees.

ISSUES:
            Zardo International sought assistance to determine whether:
1.    The actuation of Nunez in lending with 10% interest is legal.
2.    The actuation of Nunez in collecting the ATM cards and forcing withdrawal as payment is legal
3.    The actuation of Nunez in having a loan business and at the same time employee legal

OPINION:
A.   10% MONTHLY INTEREST ON A LOAN IS VOID AND ILLEGAL

The loan with 10% monthly interest is void, illegal, and has no legal effect. The 10% monthly interest is illegal since it was declared by the Supreme Court as excessive. As point of reference, the Court in a case ruled that 5.5% per month or 66% per annum interest in a loan is excessive, iniquitous, unconscionable and exorbitant (Medel v. Court of Appeals, and Spouses Solangon v. Salazar). Clearly, this is smaller than 10% per month, yet the Court ruled it as illegal. The reasonable rate is 12% per annum (in a year) or 1% per month interest.

Stipulations in a contract authorizing iniquitous or unconscionable interests are contrary to morals, if not against the law (Cauton v. Salud). Under Article 1409 of the Civil Code, these contracts are inexistent and void from the beginning. They cannot be ratified nor the right to set up their illegality as a defense be waived. Therefore, even if the employees who loaned signed a contract agreeing to the 10% interest, this has no effect since it is against morals and law. As a result, it would mean that the contracts have no stipulations on interest at all. The employees who made a loan are not required to pay interest.


B.   COLLECTING ATM AND FORCING WITHDRAWAL AS PAYMENT IS ILLEGAL
The act of collecting ATM cards and forcing withdrawal as payment could fall as a criminal offense of COERCION, punishable under the Revised Penal Code Art. 286 and 287. Any person who, without authority of law, compel another to do something against his will, whether it be right or wrong, is liable for coercion. The act of forcing withdrawal from the ATM, even if the employee has a valid debt is illegal.


C.   BEING EMPLOYED AND MAINTAINING A LOAN BUSINESS IS NOT ILLEGAL PER SE, BUT IF PERFORMRED DURING WORKABLE HOURS AND WITHIN THE PREMISES OF THE COMPANY, IT IS ILLEGAL

The employee when inside the premises of the company must perform actions to the benefit of the company. He is not allowed to engage in any other business during workable hours.  


CGRLAW & Associates
Campos Rueda Building, Unit 408
101 Export Drive, Makati City
Tel. No. (+63 2) 985 4322
Mobile: +63 918 948 6092
email:atty.claudio.g.requino@live.com.ph
   claude.requino@cgrlaw.tk
           info@cgrlaw.tk


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

TAX EXEMPTIONS ON NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS


TAX EXEMPTIONS ON NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

With the recent controversy surfaced through Janet Napoles on the Pork Barrel scam, the Bureau of Internal Revenue issued Revenue Memorandum Order No. 20-2013 prescribing new policies and guidelines in the issuance of tax exemption rulings.
Tax exemptions are frown upon by the bureau and stringent scrutiny is expected. The revenue memorandum had practically revoked all tax exemption rulings and required all non-profit organizations to renew their exemptions. The revenue memorandum applies to all tax exemptions ruling given prior to June 30, 2012. Also, all tax exemption rulings are given only for a short period of three (3) years subject to renewal.
The revenue memorandum provided new requirements that add exposure to the officers of the non-profit organizations that may subject them to perjury.
The Revenue District Officer shall strictly examine the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the organization. The purpose of the organization must clearly state the provisions of exemptions under Section 30 of the NIRC. This is essential since the purpose of the organization must not include other items that permit activities that will run contrary to a non-tax exempt purpose. Clearly, the purpose of the organization must be limited only to those described in Section 30 of the NIRC. Any items included that do not conform to the NIRC provision will cause the denial of the application.
The officer of the organization must take an oath, under fear of perjury, that no part of the organization's income inure to the benefit of any private individual and that the trustees do not receive any compensation or remuneration. Any profit must be plowed back and must be devoted or used altogether for the furtherance of the purpose for which the corporation or association was organized.

XXX
SEC. 30. Exemptions from Tax on Corporations.chanrobles virtual law library - The following organizations shall not be taxed under this Title in respect to income received by them as such:
(A) Labor, agricultural or horticultural organization not organized principally for profit;
(B) Mutual savings bank not having a capital stock represented by shares, and cooperative bank without capital stock organized and operated for mutual purposes and without profit;
(C) A beneficiary society, order or association, operating fort he exclusive benefit of the members such as a fraternal organization operating under the lodge system, or mutual aid association or a nonstock corporation organized by employees providing for the payment of life, sickness, accident, or other benefits exclusively to the members of such society, order, or association, or nonstock corporation or their dependents;
(D) Cemetery company owned and operated exclusively for the benefit of its members;
(E) Nonstock corporation or association organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, athletic, or cultural purposes, or for the rehabilitation of veterans, no part of its net income or asset shall belong to or inures to the benefit of any member, organizer, officer or any specific person;
(F) Business league chamber of commerce, or board of trade, not organized for profit and no part of the net income of which inures to the benefit of any private stock-holder, or individual;
(G) Civic league or organization not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare;
(H) A nonstock and nonprofit educational institution;
(I) Government educational institution;
(J) Farmers' or other mutual typhoon or fire insurance company, mutual ditch or irrigation company, mutual or cooperative telephone company, or like organization of a purely local character, the income of which consists solely of assessments, dues, and fees collected from members for the sole purpose of meeting its expenses; and
(K) Farmers', fruit growers', or like association organized and operated as a sales agent for the purpose of marketing the products of its members and turning back to them the proceeds of sales, less the necessary selling expenses on the basis of the quantity of produce finished by them;
Notwithstanding the provisions in the preceding paragraphs, the income of whatever kind and character of the foregoing organizations from any of their properties, real or personal, or from any of their activities conducted for profit regardless of the disposition made of such income, shall be subject to tax imposed under this Code.









CGRLAW & Associates
Campos Rueda Building, Unit 408
101 Export Drive, Makati City
Tel. No. (+63 2) 290 5898 /  (+63 2) 889 5210
Mobile: +63 918 948 6092
email:atty.claudio.g.requino@live.com.ph
   claude.requino@cgrlaw.tk
           info@cgrlaw.tk


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. You are hereby notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.